Currently, many Vietnamese citizens spend tens of millions of dong just to obtain a building permit. Maintaining this "ask-give" mechanism drains public resources and no longer suits the government's current management capabilities.

Burdensome and costly procedures

W-bo giay phep xay dung 2.jpg
Many citizens spend tens of millions of dong for a building permit. Photo: Nguyen Le

Following Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh’s directive to eliminate unnecessary administrative procedures - including building permits - many citizens expressed their support and relief.

Pham Hung, a resident of Thanh Tri District in Hanoi, shared with VietNamNet that obtaining a permit to build his five-story house required a full set of documents: a permit application, architectural design plans, and a certified copy of the land-use right certificate.

Among these, Hung said the most expensive part was hiring a designer for the architectural drawings. He spent 20 million VND (about 790 USD) for the five-story house plans. Due to the complex paperwork and time-consuming process, he also paid an additional 15 million VND (around 590 USD) to a service provider to handle the permit application on his behalf.

In total, Hung spent 35 million VND (nearly 1,380 USD) and waited about three weeks to receive his building permit. That’s why, in response to news that the Prime Minister has called for removing building permit requirements, Hung expressed his happiness: “This would be great - less hassle and cost for people.”

Legal experts support the change

From a legal standpoint, lawyer Nguyen Thanh Ha, Chairman of SBLaw, supports the removal of this requirement. He believes the move should be institutionalized soon.

Currently, under Vietnam’s amended 2014 Construction Law (updated in 2020), building permits are mandatory for most construction projects, including private homes in urban areas. However, the process has become a burden for citizens.

“Each building permit application typically takes about a month to process, with an average cost of more than 10 million VND (about 395 USD) for design drawings alone - not to mention other ‘unnamed costs.’ Most people can’t handle the process themselves and resort to hiring intermediaries or ‘permit brokers,’ which fuels corruption and inefficiency,” Ha said.

W-bo giay phep xay dung.jpg
Citizens welcome the proposal to eliminate building permit procedures. Photo: Nguyen Le

He also noted that many architectural drawings are prepared only to satisfy legal requirements, not for actual use. During construction, homeowners often modify the plans to fit real-life needs. Violations such as blocking ventilation shafts or building beyond allowed setbacks are widespread. This renders the current pre-construction approval system largely symbolic and ineffective.

Ha argued that eliminating permit requirements for private homes is feasible - provided that zoning information is transparent and local authorities effectively conduct post-construction inspections.

This shift mirrors successful models in other countries, where citizens have the right to build within legal boundaries, and government bodies monitor and penalize violations afterward.

Given that hundreds of construction projects commence daily across districts, maintaining the current “ask-give” system wastes time and resources. Switching to post-inspection doesn't mean weakening oversight - it reflects a more modern, transparent, and practical management approach.

How to eliminate building permits

According to lawyer Ha, under the Prime Minister’s directive, the proposed elimination of permit requirements would apply to buildings in areas with a 1/500 detailed zoning plan or in urban zones with approved architectural designs.

However, citizens would still need to notify local authorities so construction activities can be monitored and checked for compliance.

For the proposal to succeed, Ha emphasized the need for coordinated legal, technical, and administrative changes from central to local levels.

First, the legal framework must be updated. The National Assembly and the government must amend the Construction Law and relevant decrees and circulars to clearly define which cases are exempt from permits, under what conditions, and who holds responsibility. This will prevent misunderstandings that "permit-free" equals unrestricted construction.

Second, localities must swiftly complete and publicly disclose their 1/500 detailed zoning plans, sub-zone plans, and architectural management regulations. These will serve as technical and legal references, replacing the need for prior approvals and allowing citizens to verify compliance themselves.

Third, a shift from pre-approval to post-construction inspection must be implemented. Authorities would not intervene before building starts but would intensify inspections during and after construction. Violations - such as exceeding height limits or disrupting neighboring structures - would be strictly penalized.

To support this, local governments should develop digital zoning maps and publish them on online public service portals. This will allow citizens to access necessary information and complete any remaining formalities quickly and transparently - without face-to-face interaction with government offices.

Additionally, public education campaigns are needed to spread awareness about the new regulations. Training for local officials will also ensure uniform and lawful implementation.

“Only when all these conditions are met can the policy to remove building permits succeed - easing administrative burdens and supporting the development of modern, well-regulated urban spaces,” Ha affirmed.

Nguyen Le